| ||||||||
Figure 1: Direct Drive Transmission |
Figure 2: Friction Drive Transmission |
Figure 3: Belt Drive Transmission |
Figure 4: Gear Drive Transmission |
| The most simple type of transmission is direct drive, which means the motor is connected directly to the axle of the driven wheel. Direct drives are not common in vehicles; one of the few vehicles that uses direct drive is a unicycle. Every time your feet make one revolution, the wheel makes one revelution. |
Figure 5: Unicycle |
|
Imagine two of your neighbors have a unicycle race. Bruce's
unicycle has a regular wheel, and Karen's has a very large wheel.
If they both pedal the same rate (number of revolutions per minute),
which one of them will win?
In both cases, each revolution of the pedal means one revolution of the wheel. BUT, one revolution of Karen's wheel will roll twice as far as bruce's. So Karen would win if they pedaled at the same rate. If Bruce wanted to win, he would have to pedal twice as fast as Karen. |
Figure 6: Different wheel sizes |
| Have you ever seen pictures of very old bicycles that have huge front wheels? These bicycles allowed the rider to go faster without pedaling like a maniac! |
Figure 7: Old time bicycle |
Figure 8: Forces on a Bicycle |
The chain glides over different sized sprockets, depending on the speed of the rider. Which sprocket combination will make the rider go the fastest, given the same pedaling rate, or "cadence"? (Hint: how many times will the back sprocket [and therefore the back wheel] turn with each rotation of the front sprocket?)
Figure 9: 3-Speed bicycle sprocket combinations |
Each rotation of the front sprocket will make the back wheel rotate
once in Combo 1, twice in Combo 2, and four times in Combo 3. So,
combination 3 will go the fastest. (These sprocket combinations can also
be called "gear ratios", because the new speed is calculated
as the ratio of the driven (front) sprocket over the driven (back)
sprocket.)
So how does this affect the way the biker would use the bicycle? Well,
when the rider starts out, he uses first gear (Combo 1). As he pedals
faster, the bike starts going faster. After a while, his legs are moving
very fast, so he switches to second gear (Combo 2). No his legs only go half
as fast as a second ago, but the bike is still going fast. He can
increase his cadence again and make the bike go even faster. Once his
cadence is very high again, he can shift up to third gear (Combo 3).
If the rider is going 5 mph in first gear, how fast is he going in
third gear with the same pedaling rate or cadence?
Well, the jump from first to second gear doubles the speed, and the step
from second to third gear doubles it again. So, the rider is going four
times as fast as in the first gear. He is going 20 mph, but his legs
are moving at the same rate as at the very begining!
The term "3-speed" bike is not entirely correct, because a biker can go
more than just three different speeds. As we saw in the previous example,
our bike rider was able to continuously speed up from 5 mph to 20 mph. But
the name comes from the fact that given one cadence, the three gear ratios
will give you three different speeds. Of course, your legs can pedal at many
different rates, but "3-speed" bike sounds better than "3-gear-ratio" bike.
Figure 10: Dave downshifting at a hill |
Dave is going half the speed now, because he just downshifted. Jeff smirks as he blows by Dave. But Jeff hits the hill, and he suddenly realizes that his legs can't go very fast anymore -- it becomes very hard to pedal! He gets slower and slower, and finally stops pedaling because it's too hard. Dave passes, slowly but surely, and makes it to the top of the hill while Jeff stops part way up.
Figure 11: Jeff stops and Dave makes it |
What happened? If only Jeff could have kept pedaling at the same rate, he would have beat Dave by a mile! Let's look at each pedal stroke. Each time Dave and Jeff pedal once, Dave's back wheel goes around once (let us say it travels 10 ft), but Jeff's back wheel goes around twice (20 ft).
Figure 12: Distance Traveled per Stroke Comparison |
Dave realizes that he only has to expend half the energy per pedal
revolution than Jeff does, because Jeff goes twice as far each time.
That is why Jeff started getting very tired, because his pedals were
difficult to push. In other words, his pedals required more force
than Dave's did.
So does Dave expend less energy going up the same hill?
Dave expends have the energy per pedal revolution, but this is only
because he goes half the distance per revolution. Dave has to bedal
twice as many time sto get up the hill. So, the energy expended by
both Dave and Jeff going up the entire hill would be the SAME in
either case.
Figure 13: Energy units comparison |
So, the bottom line is, when we gain a speed advantage, we are losing the force advantage. The pedals are more difficult to turn. You can gain either speed or force advantage, but not at the same time.